Comments on: NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/ rails, design, art, business by BJ Clark Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:26:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: NoSQL Daily – Thu Sep 30 › PHP App Engine http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-275 NoSQL Daily – Thu Sep 30 › PHP App Engine Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:15:48 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-275 [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Pertinent [...] [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Pertinent [...]

]]> By: NoSQL Daily – Tue Sep 7 › PHP App Engine http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-262 NoSQL Daily – Tue Sep 7 › PHP App Engine Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:23:53 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-262 [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Perti… [...] [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Perti… [...]

]]> By: NoSQL Daily – Tue Sep 7 › PHP App Engine http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-261 NoSQL Daily – Tue Sep 7 › PHP App Engine Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:01:43 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-261 [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Pertinent [...] [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy at Marked As Pertinent [...]

]]> By: Is NoSQL the future of databases? « Online Marketing at Canada's Web Shop http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-255 Is NoSQL the future of databases? « Online Marketing at Canada's Web Shop Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:55:52 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-255 [...] Scalability is often touted as a an advantage of NoSQL, and of course there are those that dissagree. [...] [...] Scalability is often touted as a an advantage of NoSQL, and of course there are those that dissagree. [...]

]]> By: CinCy http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-83 CinCy Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:03 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-83 Very informative! There's a Dr. Dobbs' article that examines database scalability. It discusses NoSQL databases but also looks at tuple spaces, in-memory databases, XML, RDF and SQL databases. "Databases in the Cloud: Elysian Fields or Briar Patch?" is at http://www.ddj.com/database/218900502 Very informative!

There’s a Dr. Dobbs’ article that examines database scalability. It discusses NoSQL databases but also looks at tuple spaces, in-memory databases, XML, RDF and SQL databases.

“Databases in the Cloud: Elysian Fields or Briar Patch?” is at
http://www.ddj.com/database/218900502

]]> By: Keith Tomas http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-82 Keith Tomas Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:10:38 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-82 Thanks for the great information. As I have been primarily studying Hadoop I am naturally curious as to why HBase and the rest of the Hadoop family were not considered. Thanks for the great information. As I have been primarily studying Hadoop I am naturally curious as to why HBase and the rest of the Hadoop family were not considered.

]]> By: An Independent Game Developer’s Diary » Blog Archive » Bookmarks for August 7th through August 13th http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-81 An Independent Game Developer’s Diary » Blog Archive » Bookmarks for August 7th through August 13th Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:20:37 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-81 [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy - A great review of a number of NoSQL databases [...] [...] NoSQL: If Only It Was That Easy – A great review of a number of NoSQL databases [...]

]]> By: mongolove http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-80 mongolove Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:07:51 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-80 I am loving mongodb right now, it's awesome. I am loving mongodb right now, it’s awesome.

]]> By: dwight_mongodb http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-79 dwight_mongodb Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:18:45 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-79 i think it varies by product. things coming from a map/reduce heritage will naturally be oriented towards throughput more than latency. but some solutions are good for low latency -- e.g. i think mongodb is. i think it varies by product. things coming from a map/reduce heritage will naturally be oriented towards throughput more than latency.

but some solutions are good for low latency — e.g. i think mongodb is.

]]> By: Bradford http://bjclark.me/2009/08/nosql-if-only-it-was-that-easy/comment-page-2/#comment-78 Bradford Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:16:37 +0000 http://bjclark.me/?p=32#comment-78 The gist of what I got from this article is that some of the distributed DBs out now are "high-throughput, high-latency". That's pretty much true -- for now. HBase is as fast at scans as an RDBMS now, and Streamy.com serves pages directly from it. The problem is that you can't *do* anything with these databases besides high-latency calculations and low-latency gets/scans. I think that's about to change with some new functionality being added to HBase that allows rapid aggregation -- in real-time. Check it out: The gist of what I got from this article is that some of the distributed DBs out now are “high-throughput, high-latency”. That’s pretty much true — for now. HBase is as fast at scans as an RDBMS now, and Streamy.com serves pages directly from it.

The problem is that you can’t *do* anything with these databases besides high-latency calculations and low-latency gets/scans.

I think that’s about to change with some new functionality being added to HBase that allows rapid aggregation — in real-time. Check it out:

]]>